历史学家 ｜ 简体中文
发布时间：2025-09-23 17:43:10
Undoubtedly, this rewarding study firmly places adultery back on the agenda of historians of the long eighteenth century.
These categories give the economic historian no assistance whatever in his attempt to reach a significant arrangement and classification of his material.
Until recently, a central characteristic of the study of twentieth-century electoral change among historians has been its strong emphasis on national, parliamentary politics.
Some scholars have argued that points where oral sources seem to contradict other evidence is precisely where historians should focus their attention.
Thus, it is surprising that historians are just beginning to concentrate on this vast landscape.
For these reasons, literary scholars set their texts a-wobbling while historians nail theirs to the ground.
He refuses to give his experiences over to the historian and let him examine them according to the rules of scientific discourse.
One might expect it, nonetheless, to include or at least allude to discussion of events that have preoccupied recent historians.
示例中的观点不代表剑桥词典编辑、剑桥大学出版社和其许可证颁发者的观点。
